| |
40 Years Ahead Of Its Time
Lime and superphosphate mixes are nothing new. Prior to the change in heart with lime by the Government in 1960, these mixes were common practice on farms throughout the country. Farmers knew the true worth of applying limestone. However, it wasn’t without its problems; it was hard work mixing the two, and it was a lot of product to spread, if it had not gone hard already. By the early 1960s Hatuma began manufacturing properly made dicalcic phosphate. Lime and mature superphosphate were mixed together weight for weight, with water, before being allowed to ‘mature’ for four weeks. The new compounded rock hard product, dicalcic phosphate, was then broken up, crushed, screened and ready for despatch. It was no wonder farmers were excited about having a product they didn’t have to mix, or have risk going hard. But that was just the physical benefits, there was much more to this product they were about to find out . . .
Farmers who were used to applying lime and superphosphate soon began praising the better results they began achieving. Palatability, stock health, heavier weights, quality of pasture, soil life – they all started improving. Why was this? A simple way to look at it is by considering lime and superphosphate mixed together as a ‘dry’ mix are not compatible with each other. Superphosphate is water soluble with a strongly acidic pH 1.5, while limestone is non water-soluble, and has an alkaline pH 8.5. They are opposites. To apply these in their original states as a dry mix is like trying to walk north and south at the same time; it confuses the soil life and the plant. The two products actually want to bind together first. That is why they go hard over a short period of time. Hence the importance of Hatuma’s four week ‘maturing’ period; it allows the two products, with added water to act as a catalyst, to react together first so they can form the one product with a near neutral pH of 6.5-7.0, plant available phosphate, and non water-soluble characteristics.
It is also practical. For the last forty years, lime has been excluded in most annual topdressing budgets after government scientists calculated the cost of lime outweighed the benefit based on comparative pasture growth trials. Therefore it has been deemed uneconomic. Farmers have been encouraged instead to focus on pasture production through correcting “nutrient deficiencies”, particularly P and S. But in today’s intensive farming era, lime and superphosphate mixes are gaining popularity as farmers are once again recognizing the importance of applying limestone. However, the same old attitude remains; farmers are still recommended to apply their standard rate of superphosphate, DAP, urea, RPR as well as agricultural lime. This can mean total application rates of anywhere between 1,000kg/ha – 5,000kg/ha! Then there is the cartage and spreading costs associated. Add an aeroplane into that equation and the farmer has the bank manager’s phone number on speed dial. By using this method, New Zealand agriculture has ended up back in the 1960s. Yet, because there are no transport or fertiliser subsidies, and because modern farming generally recommends more fertiliser, the farmer is left with having to pay more, as well as put up with the same disadvantages as their forefathers. All except Hatuma clients.
Hatuma dicalcic clients, some for over forty years, have continued to apply their phosphate and lime in one easy and inexpensive application. Whether they are applying straight dicalcic, or the popular dicalcic and Cropfine mixes, very seldom does the rate exceed over 1,000kg/ha.
As a guideline:
| |
|
Sheep & Beef |
|
Dairy (1-2 applications per year) |
|
|
|
|
|
| * Dicalcic Phosphate |
|
200 – 350kg/ha/yr |
|
400 - 600kg/ha |
| |
|
|
|
|
| * Dicalcic / Cropfine mixes |
|
250 – 700kg/ha/yr |
|
400 – 1,200kg/ha |
|
Rule of thumb: Apply dicalcic at the same spreading rate of superphosphate | Most hill country farmers are applying a simple mix of dicalcic / Cropfine at a rate of 250-400kg/ha. This is taking care of their annual phosphate, liming and sulphur in one easy swoop. The added bonus is they do not have to necessarily apply any other fertilisers, including urea. The topdressing is done for the year, and they are now free to concentrate on other farming aspects. It is as practical as it gets.
Obviously it is cheaper too. To be able to topdress this way not only makes the contractors bill minimal, but the products themselves are very cost effective. These light application rates achieve excellent results. As disclosed earlier, dicalcic does not have to be applied at twice the rate to make up for any ‘apparent’ shortage in phosphate – it works completely different to superphosphate. The thousands of farmers using Hatuma dicalcic already know this; nearly all of them have come from superphosphate or super/lime regimes. Farmers demand that Hatuma manufacture the dicalcic to a proper standard. This includes: cartage of superphosphate to works, the supply of lime, and the manufacture process, which involves the mixing, requarrying, storage, crushing, and screening. And even then, after all this, Hatuma still manages to produce a tonne of dicalcic cheaper than a tonne of superphosphate ex-works.
The maturing period is crucial; the lime and superphosphate have to have adequate time to react. Three weeks could be enough time, but Hatuma choose to wait the fourth to ensure the job is done properly. The other crucial component is the superphosphate and lime are mixed together 50:50, weight for weight, with water. Dicalcic can be made using 75% superphosphate and 25% agricultural lime, but this will not end in a product with a near neutral pH, only one with pH 5.5 – 10 to 100 times too acidic for the beneficial microbes! This is why Joe Topp, all those years ago, insisted that the recipe use sufficient lime to ensure the end product had at least a pH of 6.5-7.0. By doing it this way, Hatuma achieves phosphate that can be utilised by the plant – through citric solubility – as it needs it, to avoid the highs and lows of pasture production. As noted below:
“After reaction, the reverted compound has a pH of near neutral (i.e. 6.6-7.0), and is soluble in weak acids such as soil solution and plant root solutions . . . it is readily available to plants.” Chemists report on Hatuma dicalcic phosphate, Vautier Enterprises
Another reason for the 50:50 ratio is to eliminate any loss of phosphate to the environment. Manufacturing dicalcic this way helps it become non water-soluble. Therefore nothing ends up in the waterways, or bound in the soil:
| 1. |
“Hatuma reverted super has a water insoluble phosphate level of 85-90%.” |
| 2. |
“It is relatively insoluble property, which means it is not easily lost due to fixation with iron, aluminium, and manganese. It is not easily leached from the soil due to its water-insolubility, as is superphosphate in light sandy soils.” |
| 3. |
“ . . . the product dibasic calcium phosphate or reverted super . . . is a completely new compound and has the properties different to either of the original constituents it is made from.” |
| Chemists report on Hatuma dicalcic phosphate, Vautier Enterprises |
But the best is yet to come. It was not until the decade of 1975-1985 that dicalcic began showing its true benefit to Hatuma and its clients. To answer a call from farmers to help overcome poor stock health, Hatuma had its own team, which included field representatives and an agronomist, who frequently used soil testing on farms. These soil tests would show up soil deficiencies resulting from the use of the acidic water-soluble fertilisers, and Hatuma would include the required trace elements into the next mix. The farm’s nutrient status would be propped back up and the farmer would continue on their way. It was a very busy time being the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff.
However, by the early 1980s things started changing. The feedback Hatuma was receiving from farmers began having a consistent theme – where trace elements were once having to be used on dicalcic farms, farmers began noticing the stock were not showing symptoms of ill thrift anymore, instead they were healthy and full of vigour. But it did not stop there. The farmers were also using less drench, and in some cases, none at all. There were no supplementary trace elements being required; for the first time it was all coming from within the soil itself. Even in districts that were supposedly deficient in elements, like copper, the dicalcic users were not adding any at all. Yet, after being tested at slaughter, the stock showed sufficient amounts. The true benefit of dicalcic was exposed. Testimonials like these became so common that Hatuma pulled out of soil testing in 1985, and they have not done one since.
This was perfect. Now Hatuma did not have to waste precious resources and time fixing the symptoms; the dicalcic went straight to dealing with the problem. This also meant less cost to the farmer too. Once farmers found they could create the perfect environment in the soil by applying Hatuma dicalcic and extra Cropfine as necessary, they began experiencing less symptoms of poor stock health. It was only a matter of time before dicalcic users became so confident the product was helping them achieve excellent stock health, they felt soil tests were not required – they could see it in the stocks’ performance. This defines how simple topdressing can be. In one dicalcic users words, “I now know disease is a sign the soil isn’t right.”
This benefit fitted in exactly with Joe Topp’s philosophy of treating the cause, not the symptom. Farmers also find the follow-on effects mean they use minimum amounts of weed sprays and animal health remedies. But it could only come from properly made dicalcic phosphate; one that was mixed 50:50 and had at least three weeks to mature. This is why Hatuma still make it to that exact recipe, more than forty years after Joe put down his first batch. Farmers insist they do the job properly, so they can achieve satisfaction from a low cost, high profit farming enterprise.
|
|